Home >

"Red Scarf" Flying In The Wind

2007/6/25 17:03:00 40386

The Zaozhuang red scarf Food Co., Ltd. applied for registration of "red scarf" trademark on twenty-ninth kinds of milk and other commodities. The trademark office is "red scarf" representing the corner of the red flag. It is a symbol of the pioneer team. It is used as a trademark to damage the young pioneers' image and is prone to produce undesirable effects.

Zaozhuang red scarf Food Co., Ltd. believes that the use of red scarves is not directly related to the young pioneers.

The trademark "the Great Wall" and "red flag" belong to this category, and the Trademark Office has approved the "red scarf" trademark in eighteenth and twenty-fifth categories.

After reviewing the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the "red scarf" is indeed a symbol of pioneer players, but it can be used as a trademark of milk and other products without damaging the young pioneers, and consumers can identify it.

Therefore, it is decided that the trademark "red scarf" registered by Zaozhuang red scarf Food Co., Ltd. on twenty-ninth types of milk and other commodities should be preliminarily approved and announced.

A small piece of jade

  • Related reading

"Le Kang Quan" Is Joyful.

Trademark registration
|
2007/6/25 17:02:00
40471

"Water Skin" Splashed With Water.

Trademark registration
|
2007/6/25 17:02:00
40479

"New Tea Flow" Does Not Exist.

Trademark registration
|
2007/6/25 17:01:00
40385

Too Straightforward Street Is Not Accessible To Rome.

Trademark registration
|
2007/6/25 17:01:00
40390

It Is Easy To Mistakenly Recognize That Fish Cannot Be Mixed With Pearls.

Trademark registration
|
2007/6/25 17:00:00
40412
Read the next article

"Matador" Is Imposing.

Lin Mingzong's trademark "Matador" applied for registration in forty-second categories of hotels and other service items was rejected by the trademark office as a reason why the trademark is similar to the "Matador TORORE" registered in the similar services of Tianjin Kangle Century Food Co., Ltd. for application for re examination. The applicant believes that there is a clear distinction between the application trademark and the citation mark, which is not enough to create c